‘The Fugitive’ at 25: Hollywood Doesn’t Make This Kind of Movie Anymore, and That’s a Shame

     August 6, 2018


The Fugitive is an amazing movie. It absolutely deserved to be nominated for Best Picture and earn Tommy Lee Jones an Oscar for Best Supporting Actor. Andrew Davis’ 1993 adaptation of the 1960s TV series of the same name is a tense thrill ride from start to finish, featuring some outstanding action, brilliant pacing, and unforgettable scenes. It’s also a movie that would likely never get made today, or if it were, it would have to be done in the ironic sense with a low-budget comedy scale. To do a straightforward adaptation and give it the funding to have a real train hit a real bus and let that be the start of the movie would just never happen. Movies like The Fugitive don’t get made anymore because they’re not big enough to be spectacle blockbusters, and they’re not small enough to be gritty little indies.

For those that have never seen The Fugitive movie or TV show, it follows Dr. Richard Kimble (Harrison Ford), who is framed for the murder of his wife (Sela Ward) by a one-armed man. Kimble escapes incarceration and goes on the run, trying to prove his innocence and find the one-armed man (Andreas Katsulas) while also helping people along the way. Kimble is hunted by Deputy U.S. Marshal Samuel Gerard (Jones) and his team, and only manages to stay a half-step ahead of the authorities. It’s a movie with well-defined stakes, intense conflict, and a tone that never really lets you breathe.


Image via Warner Bros.

Studios have continued to churn out thrillers, but in recent years, there’s really never been anything close to the size and scale of The Fugitive. The most similar kind of movie we’ve gotten are the old-violent-man movie where someone like Denzel Washington or Liam Neeson uses a specific set of skills to seriously mess up some bad guys. What’s astonishing about The Fugitive is that while the murder of Kimble’s wife is disturbing and haunting, it’s overall not a particularly violent movie. It’s a chase film and a battle of wits between two smart guys. That’s it, and yet it’s done on such an operatic scale that you feel like you’re watching something cinematic and not just a special episode of the TV series.

It’s also the kind of film that has largely vanished. You’ll hear directors and producers bemoan the fact that mid-budget movie for adults has become a relic, and they’re not wrong. The Fugitive is a little on the high side (Wikipedia lists the budget at $44 million, so adjusted for inflation, that’s about $69 million today), but it’s still in the ballpark of the movies that studios aren’t particularly keen on making. The closest you’ll get is something like The Equalizer 2, which cost $62 million to make, and it’s largely just Denzel Washington beating the life out of people. That’s fine for what it is, but it’s also a relatively easy sell, both in terms of being a sequel (the first Equalizer cost $55 million) and in terms of its premise.


Image via Warner Bros.

Some filmmakers have tried to figure out a way to get other genres into a franchise mold. For example, James Mangold made a neo-noir western with Logan and Mission: Impossible – Fallout is a revenge thriller. Even Marvel, which dominates the franchise landscape, tries to vary up their genre offerings a bit even though I don’t think they go as far as they claim. What’s important to note is that the franchise always comes first and then it’s contingent on the filmmaker to find a way to play with it to make a movie that studios would never make on first blush. You can’t make a neo-noir western, but you can make it if it stars Hugh Jackman as Wolverine.

That’s not to say that people wouldn’t want to watch two actors in a feature-length chase, but that the demands of the budget would force more spectacle on the story than it requires. The Fugitive is spectacular movie, but it’s not packed with explosions or other pyrotechnics. There’s the big crash between the train and the prison bus at the beginning, there’s the waterfall leap, and then there’s just things that cost money but they’re not effects-driven scenes like the St. Patrick’s Day parade. The Fugitive succeeds because it’s acutely focused on what it’s trying to do and never trying to use spectacle as a way to inflate the drama. It knows that it has you because you care about the conflict between Kimble and Gerard.

What’s even more frustrating is that there isn’t really a home for a movie like The Fugitive in 2018. Even if you look at the bottomless maw of content that is Netflix, they’re not making movies like The Fugitive or trying to acquire them. Look at the list of Netflix Original movies, and they remain, for the most part, relatively low-budget affairs. That makes sense when you consider that Netflix makes acquisitions from the festival circuit, but even movies they’re funding aren’t in the price range or genre of The Fugitive. Netflix’s biggest movie from a budget perspective, Bright, isn’t trying to be a thriller for adults. It’s trying to emulate blockbuster filmmaking, which assumes that you need a fantasy element and VFX-driven spectacle to get people to watch.

Although studios may not be particularly concerned with making movies like The Fugitive, the good news is that Davis’ movie holds up beautifully 25 years later. It’s just as tense, expertly crafted, and thrilling as it was when it was released, and it proves that we don’t need CGI wizardry to make action movies captivating. We don’t need grand mythos and deep genre roots to hold our attention. Those movies have their place, and Hollywood doesn’t plan to abandon those kinds of films anytime soon. And to be fair, when Hollywood went back to the well of The Fugitive, they came out with the atrocious sequel U.S. Marshals in 1998. But Hollywood shouldn’t give up on a solid, PG-13 thriller that relies on character and tone rather than VFX and popular IP. Unfortunately, all signs right now show that the studios’ response to offering this kind of movie is, “I don’t care.”

Latest News